Umair Haque / Bubblegeneration
umair haque  

 
 


Design principles for 21st century companies, markets, and economies. Foreword by Gary Hamel. Coming January 4th. Pre-order at Amazon.


 
Friday, January 13, 2006


Ha ha

So a week or two back I predicted one of the 2.0 probs would be info cascades - and people are already talking about it in exactly that way. Very nice.

-- umair // 11:01 PM // 1 comments


Comments:

In philosophy this phenomena is called Argumentum ad populum, or the bandwagon fallacy. Simply put, the volume of votes do not have anything to do with the accuracy or veracity of a claim. (See wikipedia entry here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_numerum) I've been thinking about this problem for a long time since the most popular forms of value definition on the web are simple multiple-choice voting.

But what's better? Will we see value judgements for accuracy derived from natural language analysis - the same way that we see search engines derive value judgements for relevance from web pages and links? Or will an open reputation standard evolve similar to eBay reputations, which again would be open to the same problem?

Seems to me we're asking computers to do something that they're not very good at doing, except in dead-simple ways like Digg, so we'll continue to get dead-simple outcomes.
// Anonymous James // 8:26 PM
 
 

Recent Tweets







    input
    portfolio
    contact

    mail.
    uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu

    skype.
    umair.haque

    atom feed

    technorati profile

    blog archives