It has been funny to watch references to Seth's post pop up ALL over the blogosphere today.
Umair, I agree with you about the different perspectives/agendas of content people vs filter people.
I'll add in my thoughts from the perspective of someone who was a writer in the brick and mortar world before blogs took off: say what you have to say. Say it well and take the space you need to say it.
Some of my favourite blogs are very brief. Some of them are very, very wordy. I read them for the ideas expressed, and in the case of the longer posts, I often read them not just for the content but for the craft, for the quality of the writing.
And a different thought: my gawd, do we need gatekeepers and style mavens for the very concept of blogging? One of the things I love about blogs in general is that they motivate people to *write*--people who would not have kept a journal or diary or writing notebook, people who would not have sent a letter to the editor or started a manuscript. But they are writing more, and in the process, they are reading more. That's fabulous! And from a political perspective, that is a baby step towards a critically-thinking, informed electorate that underpins a healthy democracy.
Seth's post makes me think of two things:
- living in Japan, where there was "one right way" to do just about everything. I don't think we need a monolothic vision of blogging.
- any creative subject in school -- think music, art, drama, and to an extent shop and home ec classes -- where teachers were quick to tell students: "there is only one model of sucess here; you are no good and you should quit." What a great, great shame to have authority figures try to limit peoples' participation in a creative endeavor.
Finally, I strongly support what you wrote in your earlier post: we need a bigger vision of blogging that what Seth presents in his post, and definitely one that is less post-industrial / utlitarian / ego-centric.