-
Strategies for a discontinuous future.












Sunday, December 21, 2003
 


The GoogleWeb, pt 2

Why are there no public search engines? We've got public libraries, but no public search engines. To be sure, the analogy isn't a strict one - the point I'm trying to make is that maybe the Web needs a public search engine with public APIs to become a truly public institution - because the private sector always has an incentive to privatize and capture any rents available. Like Google's doing.

If the Web is a public resource, then it will always be of limited value without a public search engine - because the aggregate value created is bounded by the efficacy and accessibility of the search mechanism.

Google's crippled APIs mean that a huge, huge part of the Web's potential value has become a deadweight loss to society - that loss is the difference between what people could do with public APIs to build cool things, versus the limitations on building those things private search engines will always impose. That's why we need a public search engine.

-- umair // 8:57 AM //


search



new


input

due diligence
ventureblog
a vc
techblurbs
tj's weblog
venture chronicles
terranova
the big picture
gigaom
venchar
bill burnham
babak nivi
n-c thoughts
paidcontent
techdirt
slashdot
london gsb
mefi
boingboing
blort
hardwax
betalounge

ing
morgan
chicago fed
dallas fed
ny fed
imf
world bank
nouriel roubini

portfolio
contact

mail.
uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu

skype.
umair.haque

atom feed

technorati profile

blog archives