Tuesday, June 14, 2005
Collaboration vs Production
OK. The meme starting to flow around the net is that peer production is 'collaboration'.
I think production is a better word - and I'm not just playing semantic games. Here's why.
Collaboration implies that people aren't self-interested - that they're altruists helping each other produce things out of the goodness of their hearts.
I think this is a pretty big error for people who are thinking seriously about peer production to make. If you assume people are altruistic, you'll end up setting exactly the wrong incentives for peer production.
But if you (in the face of a serious lack of evidence) assume that people are still mostly selfish, you'll set strong incentives for them to internalize some kind of peer production gains. These could be reputation or status effects (MeFi), revenue shares (OhMyNews), prizes (Yahoo Buzz Mkt), whatever.
So, that's why I used to originally call peer production 'massively distributed production' - not collaboration.
Comments:
Post a Comment
|
|
Recent Tweets
input
due diligence
ventureblog
a vc
techblurbs
tj's weblog
venture chronicles
terranova
the big picture
gigaom
venchar
bill burnham
babak nivi
n-c thoughts
paidcontent
techdirt
slashdot
london gsb
mefi
boingboing
blort
hardwax
betalounge
ing
morgan
chicago fed
dallas fed
ny fed
imf
world bank
nouriel roubini
portfolio
contact
mail.
uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu
skype.
umair.haque
atom feed
technorati profile
blog archives
|
|