-
Strategies for a discontinuous future.












Monday, October 10, 2005
 


Why Web 2.0 Is (Really) Important - Special Beancounters Edition

Many of my classmates from b-school are puzzled at my interest in Web 2.0. They see it as a tiny, small-change market, relative to the markets and industries they've specialized in. $20-50 million acquisitions are not exactly earth-shattering events.

Now, that's true - for now. But (and I'm sure most of you know this, but let's recap), the reason Web 2.0 is important is in it's future value.

The fundamental hypothesis of most of the people backing Web 2.0 is that it's special because it's going to be the consumer interface to many 2.0 markets. Media is one example that I've analyzed to death. Another one in whch interest is accelerating is Applications (viz, Zimbra, Google Office, etc).

Why is this? Fundamentally, it's because Web 2.0 techs make info liquid and plastic. They let it be be frictionlessly unbundled and rebundled. That, in turn, enables convergence on multiple levels.

This is why the consumer value prop is so strong - Web 2.0 is not just the infrastructure for the digital home, but also for the digital lifestyle (viz, Media 2.0 + mobility), digital productivity (Apps 2.0), peer production (Consumer Goods 2.0, etc).

Now, note also that in each of these markets, the Web 2.0 layer is the layer that the consumer connects to - it's the most strategically important segment of the value chain.

So, yeah - right now, Web 2.0 is a small-change market. My market analysis tells us that the current market size is currently between 3-5% of the media industry - not huge by any stretch of imagination.

But the potential for Web 2.0 techs to grab a nice slice of each of the markets discussed above is very real - on the order of 15-20% (to begin with). Now, throw the value of market power into the mix, and all that adds up to a fair amount of $$$. I won't run the numbers here totally, but it's on the order of hundreds of billions.

-- umair // 9:40 PM //


Comments:

Dude: please check your its/it's usage. Good thinking can be hobbled by sloppy grammar, even in blog posts.
// Anonymous // 11:24 PM
 

Greatest comment evar.
// umair // 7:02 AM
 

Funnily I used to think that geeky nature ( less & less of Beancounter) of your analysis came from the influence from LBS. That's why I used to suggest my techie friends (if they chose to apply for MBA) to pursue LBS. :)

Little did I know until now that you were an outlier in the beancounter crowd :)
// Rajan // 11:54 AM
 
Post a Comment
search



new


input

due diligence
ventureblog
a vc
techblurbs
tj's weblog
venture chronicles
terranova
the big picture
gigaom
venchar
bill burnham
babak nivi
n-c thoughts
paidcontent
techdirt
slashdot
london gsb
mefi
boingboing
blort
hardwax
betalounge

ing
morgan
chicago fed
dallas fed
ny fed
imf
world bank
nouriel roubini

portfolio
contact

mail.
uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu

skype.
umair.haque

atom feed

technorati profile

blog archives