Monday, February 06, 2006
Spam Wars - Micromotives and Macrobehaviour
Lots of talk this weekend about Yahoo + AOL deciding to charge for email.
I made the point years ago that economic solutions to spam would dominate technological solutions. I still think that's the case (for a mini case study, read Calacanis).
Now, I agree 100% that Yahoo and AOL are the two firms most likely to abuse this for their own benefit, in a perfect case of myopia.
But I also think that the shift to incentive-based models which solve spam implicitly has long been inevitable, and will continue. You can't fight economics; and though Danah makes the point that kids are shifting to IM and asynchronous comms, those only make the incentive problem worse - not better.
If anything, in the coming era edge dominance, economic models like - which rely on, to use Schelling's words, micromotives to implicitly let the right kinds of macrobehaviour emerge - are going to be more and more ubiquitous. I think radical innovators will start to see them as opportunities for disruption, rather than threats to openness; they're mechanisms that the edge needs to be able to self-organize and self-regulate.
Comments:
One question that keeps popping into my head about this: What is to prevent spammers from setting up a front company that handles spam and non-spam emailings and paying for the email? I cannot imagine that the profit margins are so low for spammers that they cannot afford this service.
Post a Comment
|
|
Recent Tweets
input
due diligence
ventureblog
a vc
techblurbs
tj's weblog
venture chronicles
terranova
the big picture
gigaom
venchar
bill burnham
babak nivi
n-c thoughts
paidcontent
techdirt
slashdot
london gsb
mefi
boingboing
blort
hardwax
betalounge
ing
morgan
chicago fed
dallas fed
ny fed
imf
world bank
nouriel roubini
portfolio
contact
mail.
uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu
skype.
umair.haque
atom feed
technorati profile
blog archives
|
|