Tuesday, March 07, 2006
Marketing 2.0 Crosses the Line Between Good and Evil
Ha ha. Lemme get this straight - exactly one day after I caution Edelman (and Rubel) that a lack of transparency is probably going to get them in trouble...it does.
That's pretty rich.
Edelman's response:
"...Bloggers can take care of themselves in this evolving world."
I won't say much, except to reiterate that transparency is the basis of trust. Trust is a necessary building block of edge competencies.
Note to Rubel and Edelman: if you guys want to leverage the edge, you have to learn from your mistakes - not just shrug them off.
The question, despite what smart guys like Jarvis are saying, isn't really an ethical one; that's your mistake. It's a strategic one. You're much better of being transparent not so much because it's "right" (though it is) but because that's how self-selection happens at the edge. Without transparency, you guys will be the Yahoo of marketing 2.0 - trying, but never really learning.
This (lack of transparency) is probably also going to get Google in (deep) trouble this year as well.
Comments:
In the case of Google, are you referring to the lack of transparency with respect to their advertising model?
Post a Comment
|
|
Recent Tweets
input
due diligence
ventureblog
a vc
techblurbs
tj's weblog
venture chronicles
terranova
the big picture
gigaom
venchar
bill burnham
babak nivi
n-c thoughts
paidcontent
techdirt
slashdot
london gsb
mefi
boingboing
blort
hardwax
betalounge
ing
morgan
chicago fed
dallas fed
ny fed
imf
world bank
nouriel roubini
portfolio
contact
mail.
uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu
skype.
umair.haque
atom feed
technorati profile
blog archives
|
|