-
Strategies for a discontinuous future.





Consulting & advisory, research notes, in the press, about bubblegen,
next wednesdays.





Tuesday, October 30, 2007
 

Industry Note: Relentlessly Breathless --> Heartattack


You know something?

The hype is really (really, really, really, really) way out of control.

Facebook - a $100 billion company? Plentyoffish - a $1 billion company?

Did a haze of vapor cocaine descend on the Valley this morning? The value of Facebook just went up by...uhhh...an order of magnitude...in two days? Are you kidding?

Look: let's all please take a deep breath.

Let's realize that gigantic valuations are not the same thing as real, durable, value creation.

In fact, the more we drink the kool-aid, the more we're actively helping the people who are only in it for a quick buck.

I think that we should all try being just a wee bit more critical of the businesses we're looking at and talking about. This means you, journalists, ReadWriteWeb, VentureBeat, and of course, the relentlessly breathless TechCrunch (ex Erick Schonfeld, who is still writing like a champ).

-- umair // 4:25 PM //


Comments:

Well, it would help if you told us your reasons why you think Plentyoffish *isn't* worth $1B. You are critical of me in your post, but do not back it up. I'm always willing to accept criticism, but not if it's delivered with no evidence.

FWIW I don't think Facebook is worth $100B either.

Richard MacManus
// Anonymous Anonymous // 7:36 PM
 

Hey Richard,

The main reason the valuation is inaccurate is that you and Markus are applying a multiple from one startup (Facebook) to value another (PlentyOfFish).

This is a big no-no in valuation. We don't know the real value of Facebook pages yet, and so using them to value others can get us into massive inflationary spirals.

(ie, i get excited, and value a pof page at 1% more than a facebook page...tomorrow, you get excited and value a facebook page at 1% more than a pof page...and on, and on)

The point is that for this kind of valuation, it's better to use harder multiples.

Of course, there are other reasons as well - POF can't scale as broadly as Facebook, it's less sticky, it's margins won't be as strong over the long-run (limited scope for ad revenue), etc - but these are secondary to the error in valuation.

Thx for the comment - i appreciate it.
// Blogger umair // 5:53 PM
 
Post a Comment
search




Public

Recent & upcoming sessions:

Supernova 2007 (video)

NMKForum



new




input

due diligence
ventureblog
a vc
techblurbs
tj's weblog
venture chronicles
terranova
the big picture
gigaom
venchar
bill burnham
babak nivi
n-c thoughts
paidcontent
techdirt
slashdot
london gsb
mefi
boingboing
blort
hardwax
betalounge

ing
morgan
chicago fed
dallas fed
ny fed
imf
world bank
nouriel roubini

portfolio
contact

mail.
uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu

skype.
umair.haque

atom feed

technorati profile

blog archives