Thursday, November 01, 2007
Research Note: OpenSocial vs Facebook, Socratic Edition
You know, focusing on the numbers myopically is not thinking strategically.
HitWise has great data about OpenSocial vs Facebook, but the conclusions many are drawing from it are very, very premature.
More often than not, numbers-driven thinking - without a true understanding of causes, effects, and interdependencies - leads us deeply into strategic error.
Let's step back and think more deeply about it.
What the value of a platform without a killer app?
Because that's the real assumption we're making when we get hysterical about Facebook vs Google purely on the basis of today's numbers.
More to the point - if you believe the hype is even a bit justified, you believe a killer app (note - app, not ads) will surface.
Which, in turn, begs the question: will it be plastic, or specific?
That is, will it be dependent on graph/platform/profile/etc data from a single network, or from many networks?
If you understand what network scale economies really are, it's almost inevitably the latter.
So who's in a dominant position - Google, or Facebook?
Does competing for openness make sense now?
It should.
Comments:
Good point.
There is no "killer app" for either platform.
I assume one will come.
Reminds me a little of NES vs. PS vs. Xbox.
# // Rick Stratton // 9:26 PM
Maybe I'm missing something that the previous commenter understands, but I'd say that Google's killer app is Search.
# // Harold Jarche // 8:30 PM
Post a Comment
|
|
Recent Tweets
input
due diligence
ventureblog
a vc
techblurbs
tj's weblog
venture chronicles
terranova
the big picture
gigaom
venchar
bill burnham
babak nivi
n-c thoughts
paidcontent
techdirt
slashdot
london gsb
mefi
boingboing
blort
hardwax
betalounge
ing
morgan
chicago fed
dallas fed
ny fed
imf
world bank
nouriel roubini
portfolio
contact
mail.
uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu
skype.
umair.haque
atom feed
technorati profile
blog archives
|
|