Monday, February 18, 2008
Edge Principles: Love > Fear
Found an interesting reponse to one of my points here -
"...
tja, true love is hard to find but definitely out there (apple, threadless, netflix, krispy kreme)
disagree."
Let's rewind and understand the relationship between love and ads: it's strongly negative. When consumers really do love stuff, those brands have to advertise less.
Why? Simple: because love isn't built by carpet-bombing people with costly ads.
On a deeper leve - as Threadless demonstrates - it's not the "brand" consumers love; and when people love stuff, they stop being "consumers".
We need a whole new vocabulary for these new dynamics.
But the point is: don't miss the forest for the trees. Yes, there are a handful of companies people love. But from an economic pov, those are the almost always guys that invest the least in advertising. They earn that love in more strategically meaningful ways.
Comments:
I want to believe you, but it doesn't look to me like Apple don't advertise.
# // Composing // 12:03 AM
phil,
apple does advertise.
is that why people love apple?
does apple advertise as much as, say, ford?
thx for the comment.
As Hugh McLeod so rightly says, if you talked to people like advertising talked to people they'd punch you in the face.
(See at Gaping Void: http://qurl.com/jts3y)
PS see you at tonight for NW.
Post a Comment
|
|
Recent Tweets
input
due diligence
ventureblog
a vc
techblurbs
tj's weblog
venture chronicles
terranova
the big picture
gigaom
venchar
bill burnham
babak nivi
n-c thoughts
paidcontent
techdirt
slashdot
london gsb
mefi
boingboing
blort
hardwax
betalounge
ing
morgan
chicago fed
dallas fed
ny fed
imf
world bank
nouriel roubini
portfolio
contact
mail.
uhaque (dot) mba2003 (at) london (dot) edu
skype.
umair.haque
atom feed
technorati profile
blog archives
|
|